首页> 外文OA文献 >Anterior cingulate cortex activity can be independent of response conflict in Stroop-like tasks
【2h】

Anterior cingulate cortex activity can be independent of response conflict in Stroop-like tasks

机译:前扣带回皮层活动可以独立于类似Stroop的任务中的反应冲突

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cognitive control includes the ability to formulate goals and plans of action and to follow these while facing distraction. Previous neuroimaging studies have shown that the presence of conflicting response alternatives in Stroop-like tasks increases activity in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), suggesting that the ACC is involved in cognitive control. However, the exact nature of ACC function is still under debate. The prevailing conflict detection hypothesis maintains that the ACC is involved in performance monitoring. According to this view, ACC activity reflects the detection of response conflict and acts as a signal that engages regulative processes subserved by lateral prefrontal brain regions. Here, we provide evidence from functional MRI that challenges this view and favors an alternative view, according to which the ACC has a role in regulation itself. Using an arrow–word Stroop task, subjects responded to incongruent, congruent, and neutral stimuli. A critical prediction made by the conflict detection hypothesis is that ACC activity should be increased only when conflicting response alternatives are present. Our data show that ACC responses are larger for neutral than for congruent stimuli, in the absence of response conflict. This result demonstrates the engagement of the ACC in regulation itself. A computational model of Stroop-like performance instantiating a version of the regulative hypothesis is shown to account for our findings.
机译:认知控制包括制定目标和行动计划并在分散注意力的同时遵循这些目标和计划的能力。先前的神经影像学研究表明,类似Stroop的任务中存在冲突的反应替代方案,会增加背扣带前皮质(ACC)的活动,表明ACC参与了认知控制。但是,ACC功能的确切性质仍在争论中。流行的冲突检测假设认为ACC参与了性能监视。根据这种观点,ACC活动反映了对反应冲突的检测,并充当了参与由额前脑外侧区域提供的调节过程的信号。在这里,我们提供了功能性MRI的证据,这些证据对这一观点提出了挑战,并支持另一种观点,根据这一观点,ACC本身就在调节中发挥作用。使用箭头词Stroop任务,受试者对不一致,一致和中立的刺激做出反应。冲突检测假设做出的关键预测是,仅当存在冲突的响应替代方案时,才应增加ACC活性。我们的数据表明,在没有反应冲突的情况下,中性的ACC反应要比全等刺激大。该结果表明ACC参与了法规本身。实例化法规假设的一个版本的类似Stroop的性能的计算模型显示了我们的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号